Sunday, December 07, 2008
Portland's most historic place; its original riverfront downtown: the first commercial district, seaport, Chinatown, a foothold for Jewish and Italian immigrants, Japantown, Skid Road, -all mixed and stacked upon each other like so much geologic strata. Its past holds veneration and neglect -but for the Skidmore Old Town District, the core of what survives, the future is now...
"Portland seemed to us to be nearly as great a place as San Francisco. The approach to it is of the same kind, so far as that the railway lands us on the eastern side of the Willamette, and that a big ferryboat transfers us across the river to the city. The city rises from the waters edge and covers what used to be pine clad hills. The depth of the water allows the grain ships to lie alongside the wharves to load, and there is a busy scene with the river steam boats and tugs and ferryboats passing and re-passing. The original wooden shanties are rapidly being replaced by great structures of stone and brick."
-Wallis Nash from "Oregon: There and Back in 1877,"
The quote from Wallis Nash is one of the few that likens Portland to the city by the Golden Gate. Besides the level of activity and the "former pine clad hills" (sic), a clue to why can be found with "the great structures of stone and brick" rising by the river. San Francisco's and Portland's ascents were coincident with the height of cast-iron as a building material for the facades of commercial structures. Newcomers like Seattle were still being built largely of wood.
"We are rather inclined to think of early Portland as a frontier town, with limited cultural development compared to our present enlightened state; particularly as respects architecture. However, one only has to look at the photographs of Front and First Streets taken in the 1880s to realize that era had attained a sophistication which we have seldom equaled in our own time. We excel in size, but can learn from their achievements."
-Richard E. Ritz from "An Architect Looks at Downtown Portland" 1991, the Greenhills Press.
Modern, European inspired, Portland's blocks of Italianate-styled stores, hotels, banks and corporate headquarters laid a template for Portland's aspirations that is familiar to this day.
Minor White photograph, Front Avenue in 1939. (click on images to expand).
"The Architects of that time were working with the latest technology in commercial construction: cast iron. They were creating not only distinguished buildings, but equally significantly, they were thinking as urban designers, and considering the whole block, the street, the whole city in fact. Notice the rhythm of the repetitive bays, which is carried from building to building, even though the detail is changed for variety, and to provide a distinct character for individual buildings. If this seems to be an accidental result of using the available material, then look at the continuity of the cornice lines and belt courses. Here different owners with different architects have successfully unified four or more buildings on one block. Each block was also related to the next, as also to the block across the street, thus giving the street space a feeling of enclosure as well as linear continuity. Both concepts are largely neglected today."
-Richard E. Ritz from "An Architect Looks at Downtown Portland" 1991, the Greenhills Press.
The Alisky and Hegele Building (1878) on First Street between Alder and Morrison. -from "The Grand Era of Cast-Iron Architecture in Portland by William John Hawkins III.
San Francisco's cast-iron downtown was largely destroyed in the earthquake and fire of 1906. By that time, Portland's downtown had moved inland, with its retail, business and civic districts away from the flood prone river. The riverfront became known as a warehouse and wholesale district, and for Chinatown, along Second Street, which had been there from nearly the beginning.
"Portland Jones -He pays the freight." A 1904 receipt from Jones Cash Store, a wholesaler on Front Street between Washington and Stark. Phone number: Oregon Phone Main #521.
"In the old business section along the waterfront the narrow streets are still lined with mansard-roofed commercial structures erected between 1860 and 1890, with brick, wood, cast-iron and ornamental plaster facades -all of dubious design. Today these buildings that were formerly important retail business houses are given over to the wholesale trade and to Portland's Chinatown." -from the WPA compiled "Oregon, End of the Trail, American Guide Series," 1940.
Minor White photograph. Front Avenue 1940.
"Vote For Progress- Vote 500x Yes for Front Avenue Development" brochure (1940).
The riverfront downtown remained largely intact into the early 1940s when "improvements" to Front Avenue (the creation of the Harbor Drive freeway) lead to the demolition of every on its east side. It was the start of a process that continued into the 1950s and 1960s, fed on by the addition of new bridge approaches and acres upon acres of surface parking lots.
"Beautification -Removal of old buildings, landscaping of waste land, and development of scenic parks along the Willamette River would make Portland's waterfront one of the most beautiful in the country." -Vote 500x Yes brochure arguing in favor of what would eventually be known as the Harbor Drive freeway (1940).
Minor White photograph.
A portion of the riverfront downtown, circa 1969: a landscape of parking lots and bridge approaches. The picture is from greater height, but of much the same area as the drawing at the start of this article. Note the Oregon Journal Building (the former Public Market) in the process of being torn down. Harbor Drive (along the river) was to be widened there once it was removed. (A group called "Riverfront for People" would come up with a better idea, now known as Tom McCall Waterfront Park.)
Preservationist extraordinaire Eric Ladd atop the cast-iron faced he salvaged from the Ladd and Tilton Bank's demolition. The results of his efforts, a great example of historic re-use can be read about in "Lost and Found" http://cafeunkown.blogspot.com/2007_01_01_archive.html
-Photo courtesy of Brandon Spencer.
Preservationists, such as Eric Ladd, Jerry Bosco and Ben Milligan worked tirelessly to save what remained of the old downtown, often arriving during demolition to save fixtures for future use. In 1973 architect William John Hawkins III (author of "The Grand Era of Cast Iron Architecture in Portland) formed the Portland Friends of Cast-Iron Architecture, a group to advocate for the area's preservation.
In 1975 the "Skidmore Old Town National Historic District" was added to the National Register of Historic Places. It was designated as a National Historic landmark in 1977.
Since then, a quarter century of restoration has lead to the revival that has attracted the likes of Mercy Corps (the Skidmore Fountain aka Packer-Scott Building) and the University of Oregon (see "A Good Ruin is Hard to Find" http://cafeunkown.blogspot.com/2006_09_01_archive.html )
Rising property values and extensive transit access meant that many of the surface parking lots in the area will be converted to higher use. This has generated the need for new design guidelines for the district. Those guidelines are now nearly complete.
There is much to like. They encourage Italianate architectural elements and the re-introduction of Portland's large inventory of saved cast-iron fixtures.
But additions to the guidelines by the Portland Planning Bureau could very well make Skidmore Old Town a victim of its own success...
On December 18, 2008 the City Council will make a decision that could drastically affect the future character o f the Skidmore Old Town National Historic District by removing pre-existing zoning to allow development up to 130 feet (13 stories) on select sites within the district.
The new zoning proposal is favored by the Planning Bureau. It is opposed by the Portland Historic Landmark Commission. It also runs counter to the Portland Development Commission's stated goals at the start of the guideline process:
"The historic context of this Historic District is a major city asset, and along with new investment, can attract greater activity and benefits to the area. Recommendations for potential updates to the Skidmore / Old Town Historic District design guidelines may help promote contemporary high quality projects that are compatible with the historic buildings character and scale. Specifically revised design guidelines can help rebuild a continuous vibrant streetscape edge in the district."
-The Portland Development Commission's Ankeny Burside Framework Summary 2005 (emphasis added).
The current code limits building heights to 75 feet, which meshes with the historic 3 to 4 floored, 30 to 60 foot high buildings common to the area. The limits are similar to those that protect historic districts in Denver, Boston, St, Louis, Seattle and Vancouver BC.
To nearly double the limits to allow development up to 13 stories would greatly change the historic fabric and nature of the Skidmore Old Town National Historic District, even to the point of threatening its status as a National Landmark (the National Park Service is highly critical of the change).
The strongest argument against rezoning is obtained by direct observation.
What follows is a tour of Old Town / Skidmore in this case as it pertains to three of the five sites up for higher rise development:
The Merchants' Hotel Building (1880) designed by Portland architect Warren H. Williams, on the corner of NW Second and Davis. The picture is taken from a surface parking lot that, if rezoned, would allow a 13 story building to tower over the landmark building. In fact, the Merchants' Hotel would be bracketed on both east and west sides (NW 3rd and Davis) by higher rise development if the zoning for the area is revised.
If rezoned, a new building constructed on the parking lot at SW 2nd and Ash would dwarf the block the holds Glison's Building (1889) better known today as Kell's Irish Restaurant and Pub. Glison's Building (yes, that Glison) was the last cast-iron building constructed in Portland. Next to it, hidden under a ghastly remodeling job, is the Phoenix Building (1879) which once housed the nationally famous Povey Brothers Art Glass Works. One can hope that it will eventually re-emerge as its namesake portends.
The Richardson Romanesque styled New Market Annex (1889) is one of the higher buildings in the district. It too would be overshadowed by a 13 floor building between SW 2nd and 3rd along Ash Street.
The Sinnott House (1883) would be exempt from the zoning change. Not so the low rise building beyond it that once held the Kida Company or one of Portland's better urban whimsies, the facade of the Simon Building (1892) which encloses a surface parking lot. Higher rise development there would also bracket the Merchants' Hotel Building on its west side across the street.
The facade of the Simon Building (1892).
"...the riches of a city."
A growing number of Portlanders have become aware of the impending threat to the character of the Skidmore / Old Town District. They are mobilizing to add their voices to a debate that up to now has been confined to narrow interests. A city-wide discussion needs to take place but there is very little time.
The City Council votes on the issue on on December 18, 2008. Advocates of Skidmore / Old town urge the City Council to vote down the height changes, or, at the very least, postpone action until a broader airing of viewpoints is accomplished.
If stewardship of Portland matters to you, the City Council needs to know. Letters should be written, emails sent, both to the council and to media outlets.
Spread the word! Blog early, blog often. If you are on Facebook show your support by adding Skidmore Old Town as a "friend" http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/profile.php?id=645760516&ref=ts
If you want to get in touch with this effort, which was started by Portland State University's Virginia Butler, e-mail me at d (my first initial) haneckow (my last name) @ comcast.net.
The future of Portland's most historic place is now. There are great opportunities and there are mistakes that can only be made once.
We have to be involved.
"...We excel in size, but can learn from their achievements."
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
It is important to promote both good architecture and urbanism in Portland. I would encourage you to ask for better design standards for these new buildings. Your ultimate goal should be new buildings that increase the quality of Portland. The fight to restrict height limits does not protect you from bad architecture. Cities like Vancouver and Miami have adopted design guidelines that control the height of buildings on the streets and allow for developers to gain increased building.
I'm all for good architecture, and good tall architecture. In the post "At the Pig and Whistle" I said nothing disparaging about replacing the Zell Brothers building with the new Moyer Tower, even though the Zell Brothers Building was historic and significant from a design standpoint. As painful as it was to see it go, in the end I felt it was an appropiate place for a high rise.
I don't think it is possible to add higher rise development in Old Town Skidmore without doing the district harm. It would be kind of like trying to find a good species of ivy to introduce to Forest Park. It might be impossible.
Even tower happy Vancouver BC recognizes that high-rise development isn't appropiate for all places and protects Gas Town and the historic Chinatown with zoning similar to what Portland is seeking to do away with in Skidmore Old Town.
Thanks for raising this issue with your readers. FYI, the Architectural Heritage Center/Bosco-Milligan Foundation have taken a strong stand against the possibility of higher buildings in the district and in favor of the enlightened new guidelines proposed by the Landmarks Commission.
Lots of links and background information can be found on the AHC website: http://www.visitahc.org which has links in its Advocacy News section to sources of letters and agency filings, including the design guidelines.
The prospect of a rejuvenated Old Town, with reconstructed cast iron buildings filling in the unsightly gaps now used for parking, is an exciting one. In some instances it will be possible to reconstruct buildings with significant amounts of their original materials. In other instances buildings that once stood just outside the district on a site now occupied by something else can be reconstructed in the district. The effect could result in a signature and emblematic section of Portland that is not only economically viable but also a major tourist attraction.
Unfortunately, there are ownership interests in the district that seem willing to wait until the city gets tired of the ugly parking lots and abandons the historic designation -- thereby hugely enriching the current, patient property owners. The City Council MUST jolt these owners into developing their property with the existing height restrictions -- based on the certainty that they will never be lifted.
Too bad that the PDC owns 2 of these sites targeted for higher buildings. Shame on them. They should be leading the charge to develop creatively designed, compatible in-fill buildings for the district, not undermining the district's integrity.
Love your insightful essay. Due to snowy weather the Dec. 18 City Council meeting was rescheduled. It is tentatively booked for March 19, 2009. So there is still time for interested readers to get active on behalf of this historic district.
Keeping buildings in-scale is critical for bringing the district together in a cohesive historical context. There are so many reasons to maintain a lower building height standard -- not the least of which is simply comfort for humans walking around Old Town with smaller scale buildings creating an entirely different density vibe than you'd experience in the Pearl or elsewhere. There are plenty of development sites for larger buildings -- there is only one Old Town/Chinatown/Skidmore. It is the city's birthplace. It deserves our respect.
Portland is ready for this district's economic revival. Replacing the parking lots with architecturally, historically appropriate smaller scale buildings (hopefully re-installing some of the original cast iron components salvaged by Ladd, Bosco and Milligan) will solidify it's status and enhance it's preciousness.
Anyone can attend the meeting; you can check PortlandOnline to verify schedule -- note an interim date of Feb. 4 had been posted, but as of today slated for March 19.
Subject: SKIDMORE/OLD TOWN CODE AMENDMENTS-DESIGN GUIDELINES
Thank you so much for making me even more homesick than I already am! For six years, I was a narrating Gray Line tour driver with the Portland City Tour as one of my assigned tours. We drivers were given a basic outline for our narration and told to "fill in the blanks". I did my homework well, although several years later, I have forgotten a good deal of the information I gathered. My favorite example of PDX architecture: the Poppleton Building (I see from your photos that the round window at the top seems to have been covered over from the inside).
I know reside near Lexington, KY, a city that is serious about mimicking Portland's many attributes, including light rail and a downtown transit mall, and let me tell ya, they could use it!
Post a Comment